His people-centered approach to leadership can be a guide for anyone in a position of authority.
The Kennedy administration had been publicly embarrassed by the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion in Maywhich had been launched under President John F. Kennedy by CIA -trained forces of Cuban exiles.
Afterward, former President Dwight Eisenhower told Kennedy that "the failure of the Bay of Pigs will embolden the Soviets to do something that they would otherwise not do.
Speaking to Soviet officials in the aftermath of the crisis, Khrushchev asserted, "I know for certain that Kennedy doesn't have a strong background, nor, generally speaking, does he have the courage to stand up to a serious challenge.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. October Shackleton leadership in crisis how and when to remove this template message When Kennedy ran for president inone of his key election issues was an alleged " missile gap " with the Soviets leading.
Actually, the US at that time led the Soviets by a wide margin that would only increase. Inthe Soviets had only four intercontinental ballistic missiles R-7 Semyorka.
By Octoberthey may have had a few dozen, with some intelligence estimates as high as Khrushchev increased the perception of a missile gap when he loudly boasted to the world that the Soviets were building missiles "like sausages" but Soviet missiles' numbers and capabilities were nowhere close to his assertions.
The Soviet Union had medium-range ballistic missiles in quantity, about of them, but they were very unreliable and inaccurate. The US had a considerable advantage in total number of nuclear warheads 27, against 3, and in the technology required for their accurate delivery.
The US also led in missile defensive capabilities, naval and air power; but the Soviets had a 2—1 advantage in conventional ground forces, more pronounced in field guns and tanks, particularly in the European theater. It was Khruschev's attempt to achieve a balance of power. A newer, more reliable generation of ICBMs would become operational only after In order to meet the threat it faced in, andit had very few options.
Moving existing nuclear weapons to locations from which they could reach American targets was one. Khrushchev made West Berlin the central battlefield of the Cold War. Khrushchev believed that if the US did nothing over the missile deployments in Cuba, he could muscle the West out of Berlin using said missiles as a deterrent to western countermeasures in Berlin.
If the US tried to bargain with the Soviets after it became aware of the missiles, Khrushchev could demand trading the missiles for West Berlin.
Since Berlin was strategically more important than Cuba, the trade would be a win for Khrushchev, as Kennedy recognized: With actions like attempting to expel Cuba from the Organization of American States placing economic sanctions on the nation and conducting secret operations on containing communism and Cuba, it was assumed that America was trying to invade Cuba.
As a result, to try and prevent this, the USSR would place missiles in Cuba and neutralize the threat. More than US-built missiles having the capability to strike Moscow with nuclear warheads were deployed in Italy and Turkey in Khrushchev was also reacting in part to the nuclear threat of obsolescent Jupiter intermediate-range ballistic missiles that had been installed by the US in Turkey in April Another major reason why Khrushchev placed missiles on Cuba was to level the playing field.
Before this event, America had the upper hand as they could launch from Turkey and destroy USSR before they would have a chance to react.
After the transmission of nuclear missiles, Khrushchev had finally established mutually assured destruction. Mutually assured destruction means that if America decided to launch a nuclear strike against the USSR, the latter would react by launching a nuclear strike against America.
According to Khrushchev, the Soviet Union's motives were "aimed at allowing Cuba to live peacefully and develop as its people desire".Leadership in Crisis: Ernest Shackleton and the Epic Voyage of the Endurance.
(). Harvard Business School. Nov 09, · The challenges organizations face today call for a new kind of leadership. Shackleton vs. Scott The aim of this assignment is to compare and contrast the two leadership styles of Shackleton and Scott.
The knowledge of the leadership theories outlined in class will be part of this assignment as well as an analysis of the soft skills and leadership decisions, . Nov 22, · The challenges organizations face today call for a new kind of leadership. Children's literature or juvenile literature includes stories, books, magazines, and poems that are enjoyed by children.
Modern children's literature is classified in two different ways: genre or the intended age of the reader. Children's literature can be traced to stories and songs, part of a wider oral tradition, that adults shared with children before publishing existed.
Leadership in Crisis Sir Ernest Shackleton and the Epic Voyage of the Endurance _By Venkataraman K Entrepreneurship_technology and Livelihood Education Ch12 Discussion Blue.