Enterprise builds on people case study answers

It is the parenthesis that fills verses It comes in the middle of the table of nations and, in a sense, interrupts it. These verses deal, not with the general movements of peoples and nations, but with one particular descendant of Cush, Nimrod, who is said to have been the founder of the first world empire.

Enterprise builds on people case study answers

Wikis introduce to the Internet a collaborative model that not only allows, but explicitly encourages, broad and open participation.

One problem is the deliberate vandalism of Wiki pages. Anyone can write nonsense as though it were fact. Enterprise builds on people case study answers can accidentally delete useful information. Wikis can impose various forms of control to protect against these risks, including user registration, moderation, enforced stylistic rules, and imposing prescribed topic structures and page layouts.

These types of control, however, are typically seen as contrary to the basic Wiki concept. Consequently, one of the central tensions when managing a Wiki is between centralized control and anarchy. In the public arena, the balance of power tends towards anarchy, but in a corporate environment a more centralized approach is often required.

In this article I describe one application of the Wiki way to a common corporate process and extract some guidelines for the effective use of Wikis in that context.

The example on which these reflections are based is a project within the software company CorVu [1] to improve the technical knowledge base related to the products we sell.

Like many companies, CorVu has extensive knowledge of its own products and a desire to make that knowledge available to customers. A major block to achieving that desire has been a lack of people with the time to either record the internal knowledge or to fashion the knowledge into a customer-ready format.

We needed to spread the load so that a broad range of developers, tech writers, professional service consultants and others could all contribute what time and knowledge they had to a shared goal.

Our hope was that a process built around several Wiki sites would facilitate this collaborative approach. But without documented cases such as this one, any theorizing about the balance of power issue is just speculation. Three contexts for a Wiki To start with, it is important to clarify the key differences between three contexts in which Wikis are used: It may be that editing content is restricted to a registered user group as is the case with Wikipediabut anyone can register.

Consequently, the size of the contributing community is potentially huge, there is a high level of anonymity, and the contributors do not typically relate to each other outside the confines of the Wiki. In this context, very little centralized control is evident. This is the essence of anarchy: In an anarchy, it is not the case that there is no control; rather, the control is exerted by peers around the edges rather than by an authority in the centre.

Requiring registration prior to participation does not alter the anarchistic nature of the process. Registration has numerous benefits, not least of which is that contributors can be recognized and gain respect for their contributions.

That sense of belonging is essential to any viable anarchy. Moderation invests some users with the power to limit the contributions of other users. While moderation is sometimes seen as necessary in order to combat vandalism and dissension, this imposition of authority denies the libertarian aspirations of most public Wikis.


Membership of the team predates and takes precedence over membership of the Wiki community. A person joins the team and as a by-product may be requested or required to use the Wiki. The number of people participating tends to be small and the contributors are likely to relate to each other outside the context of the Wiki.

In contrast to public Wikis, where self-selection guarantees that the vast majority of users are technically savvy and keen to be involved, the people contributing to a team Wiki may not be doing so voluntarily or with much enthusiasm. It may well be a required part of their work that they would prefer to avoid.

Enterprise builds on people case study answers

The need to make the Wiki as easy as possible to use becomes even more important in this context. This includes clear navigation and an effective search function, but more than anything else it means a simple, familiar user interface for editing text.

Many team Wikis fail simply because the potential contributors refuse to learn Wiki markup or to use a non-wysiwyg editor.

In this context, registration is essential, but moderation is not. The restrictions on who can contribute protect against vandalism and, because the collaborators have pre-existing relationships and a common commitment to a higher cause, the community operates with a trust model.

In fact, apart from the restrictions on membership, a team Wiki is unlikely to impose much control at all over contributions.

The collaborators will discuss and vote, or demand and threaten, or just do what the boss says, without that process being explicitly controlled by mechanisms within the Wiki.You now have access to what I believe is the most effective teambuilding system in existence.

No, it is not this book, How NASA Builds Teams. It is this book combined with (free) assets available at benjaminpohle.com I know this because we have developed nearly NASA project, engineering, and management teams over the past five years.

Enterprise builds on people case study answers

Philips is a Dutch diversified technology company with sales and services available in more than countries. The company’s U.S. healthcare division used Attunity CloudBeam, available on the AWS Marketplace, to upload 37 million records from an on-premises database to .

Robert Gagnon's Answers to Emails on the Bible and Homosexuality _____ Index. I get a lot of email correspondence. Featured. McKinsey Academy Our learning programs help organizations accelerate growth by unlocking their people's potential.

Solved: Enterprise Builds On People When Most People Think | benjaminpohle.com

Enterprise Rent-A-Car case study About Enterprise Rent-A-Car Enterprise Rent-A-Car, a $12 billion international transportation leader, is the largest rental car company in North America in terms of fleet size and locations. Chapter 1: What Is DevOps? The word “DevOps” was coined in by Patrick Debois, who became one of its gurus.

The term was formed by combining “development” and “operations,” which provides a starting point for understanding exactly what people typically mean when they say “DevOps.”.

Answers to Emails on the Bible and Homosexuality